Review is repetitive. Automate the mechanical parts.
Most PR review time goes to pattern-level checks: is the error handling consistent? Are the tests covering the new branch? Did the author follow the naming convention? These checks are important but mechanical — exactly the kind of work an agent handles well.
Onevium lets you point Claude at a pull request and get structured feedback before you start reading the diff yourself. The agent checks out the branch, reads the changes in context, runs the project's linters and type checker, and produces a review organized by severity.
Custom skills shape what the reviewer looks for
Every team has its own conventions. Onevium's custom skills let you encode yours as reusable instructions the agent follows during review.
- A security skill that flags hardcoded secrets, unsafe deserialization, or missing auth checks.
- A style skill that enforces your team's naming conventions, import ordering, and file structure.
- A test coverage skill that checks whether new code paths have corresponding test cases.
From review to fix in one step
When the agent finds an issue, it does not just comment — it can propose the fix. Accept the suggestion, and the change is applied to the branch directly. The feedback loop between 'found a problem' and 'shipped the fix' shrinks from hours to seconds.